Integrative Risk and Performance-Based SIMBG Model  for Sustainable Building Governance in Gianyar, Bali

Ida Ayu Sri Onie Ledysianty; I Dewa Gede Agung Diasana Putra; Ngakan Ketut Acwin Dwijendra; Anak Agung Gde Agung Yana

doi:10.59890/ijist.v4i3.304

Authors

Ida Ayu Sri Onie Ledysianty Doctoral Program in Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University
I Dewa Gede Agung Diasana Putra Doctoral Program in Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University
Ngakan Ketut Acwin Dwijendra Doctoral Program in Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University
Anak Agung Gde Agung Yana Doctoral Program in Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Udayana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijist.v4i3.304

Keywords:

SIMBG, isk management, building performance, digital governance, Bali architecture

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the Building Management Information System (SIMBG) in Gianyar Regency, Bali, with a focus on its limitations in integrating risk- and performance-based evaluations into the building permit process. Despite being a national digital platform for building approvals (PBG) and functional certificates (SLF), SIMBG implementation remains largely administrative and lacks contextual adaptation to local cultural and environmental conditions. This research aims to develop an integrative model that combines building risk classification, performance evaluation, and local wisdom principles, such as Tri Hita Karana and Asta Kosala Kosali. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving surveys, interviews, field observations, and Focus Group Discussions (FGD). Quantitative analysis used logistic regression and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The results indicate that risk classification and performance indicators significantly influence the effectiveness of SIMBG. The proposed model enhances decision-making accuracy, improves regulatory compliance, and supports sustainable building governance. This study contributes to the development of digital public governance theory by integrating risk, performance, and cultural dimensions into a unified regulatory framework.

References

Arini, D. (2022). Evaluation of SIMBG implementation in urban areas. Jurnal Manajemen Infrastruktur, 9(2), 103–115.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dwijendra, N. K. A. (2020). Harmonizing traditional Balinese architecture and urban planning. Journal of Architecture and Environment, 18(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1234/jae.v18i1.2020

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000: Risk management—Guidelines. ISO.

Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16th ed.). Pearson Education.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 tentang Bangunan Gedung. (2021).

Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). PMI.

Preiser, W. F. E., Rabinowitz, H. Z., & White, E. T. (1988). Post-occupancy evaluation. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Rapoport, A. (1969). House form and culture. Prentice-Hall.

Wiryawan, I. G. A., & Mahendra, N. G. (2023). Implementation of safety, health, and environmental aspects in SLF assessment. Jurnal Keamanan Bangunan, 7(1), 41–55.