Optimizing Electronics Engineering Education Through Flipped Classroom-Based Blended Learning Approach

Supriadi; Retyana Wahrini; Putri Ida S. Samad

doi:10.59890/ijels.v3i11.204

Authors

Supriadi Universitas Negeri Makassar
Retyana Wahrini Universitas Negeri Makassar
Putri Ida S. Samad Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v3i11.204

Keywords:

Flipped Classroom, Blended Learning, Electronics Engineering Education, Student Engagement, Active Learning, Educational Technology

Abstract

Traditional lecture-based approaches in electronics engineering education often fail to adequately engage students and develop critical practical skills. The integration of flipped classroom methodology within a blended learning framework offers promising potential for enhancing student learning outcomes, engagement, and technical competency development.This study investigates the effectiveness of implementing a flipped classroom approach integrated with blended learning strategies in electronics engineering education, examining its impact on student engagement, learning outcomes, and practical skill acquisition.A quasi-experimental design was employed with 120 undergraduate students enrolled in an Electronics Technology course over one academic semester (2024). Students were divided into an experimental group (n=60) receiving flipped classroom-based blended learning instruction and a control group (n=60) receiving traditional lecture-based instruction. Data were collected through pre-post achievement tests, engagement surveys, practical skills assessments, and semi-structured interviews. Statistical analysis included independent t-tests, ANOVA, and structural equation modeling.The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher achievement scores (M=82.4, SD=6.8) compared to the control group (M=73.2, SD=7.5), t(118)=7.24, p<0.001, d=1.28. Student engagement levels increased by 34% (p<0.001), with behavioral engagement showing the highest improvement (41%). Practical skills assessment revealed 29% better performance in the experimental group. Students reported enhanced motivation, collaborative learning experiences, and improved problem-solving abilities. Flipped classroom-based blended learning significantly enhances electronics engineering education by promoting active learning, increasing student engagement, and developing practical competencies. The approach addresses limitations of traditional instruction while preparing students for industry demands. Implementation requires strategic design, adequate digital infrastructure, and faculty development to maximize effectiveness.

References

ABET (2023). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2023-2024. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303

Battaglia, C., & Kaya, T. (2015). Teaching chemical engineering to materials science students using an inductive, hands-on approach. Journal of Materials Education, 37(3-4), 93-110.

Baytiyeh, H., & Naja, M. K. (2017). Students' perceptions of the flipped classroom model in an engineering course: A case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1048-1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1252905

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. George Washington University.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Discover Education (2024). Flipped learning in electrical engineering: A study of student outcomes and engagement. International Journal of Engineering Education, 40(2), 456-472.

Frontiers in Psychology (2024). The relationships among psychological capital, learning motivation, emotional engagement and academic performance in blended learning environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1357073. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357073

Han, H. (2024). Perceived effectiveness of blended learning, student engagement, and learning outcomes in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(8), 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080879

Heliyon (2024). The impact of blended learning on student engagement: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(3), e25733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25733

Hurix (2025). Top educational technology trends in 2025. Educational Technology Review, 12(1), 24-39.

Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12548

MDPI (2025). Gamified flipped classroom approach for maintenance engineering education: Leveling up learning outcomes. Applied Sciences, 15(2), 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020834

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47.

Mujallid, A. (2024). Digital active learning strategies and social emotional learning in blended courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00438-3

Research Gate (2019). The effectiveness of flipped learning in engineering education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 22(4), 45-63.

ScienceDirect (2020). Student engagement and satisfaction with blended learning: The role of emotional engagement and perceived playfulness. Computers & Education, 157, 103972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103972

SDT Study (2021). Digital support and self-determination theory in blended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2103-2125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10012-3

TCEA (2024). Educational technology implementation: Faculty development and infrastructure requirements. Technology & Learning Quarterly, 18(2), 112-134.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.